Sunday, February 24, 2008

Hillary vs Obama... Who has the experience?

 In 2 years as a Senator, Obama authored 152 bills - Hillary: 20 in 6 years



Let's take a closer look at who's really qualified and or who's really working for the good of all of us in the Senate. Obama or Clinton.


Records of these two candidates should be scrutinized in order to make an informed decision.


Senator Clinton, who has served only one full term - 6yrs. - and another year campaigning, has managed to author and pass into law - 20 - twenty pieces of

legislation in her first six years.


These bills can be found on the website of the Library of Congress but to save you trouble, I'll post them here for you:


1. Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site.

2. Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month.

3. Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.

4. Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall.

5. Name courthouse after James L. Watson.

6. Name post office after Jonn A. O'Shea.

7. Designate Aug. 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day.

8. Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day.

9. Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial of his

death.

10. Congratulate the Syracuse Univ. Orange Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the

championship.

11. Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men's Lacrosse Team on winning

the championship.

12. Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemorative

Program.

13. Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda.

14. Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express

condolences on her death.

15. Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost

their lives on duty. Only five of Clinton's bills are, more substantive.

16. Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11.

17. Pay for city projects in response to 9/11 18. Assist landmine victims in

other countries.

19. Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care.

20. Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected

in the wilderness preservation system.


There you have it, the fact's straight from the Senate Record. You decide for yourself how important her work has been.


Now, I would post those of Obama's, but the list is too substantive, so I'll mainly categorize.


During the first - 8 - eight years of his elected service he sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced:

233 regarding healthcare reform,

125 on poverty and public assistance,

112 crime fighting bills,

97 economic bills,

60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills,

21 ethics reform bills,

15 gun control,

6 veterans affairs and many others.


His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and co-sponsored another 427. These included:


1. Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006 - became law,

2. Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, - became law,

3. Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the Senate,

4. 2007 Government Ethics Bill, became law,

5. Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, In committee, and many more.


In all, since entering the State/U.S. Senate, Senator Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1096.


An impressive record, for someone who supposedly has no record according to some who would prefer that this comparison not be made public.


-------------------


Disclaimer: As this was sent to me I cannot guarantee the validity of it all.  I did start checking it, thinking it impossible, and was 100% accurate when I stopped spot checking it.

Advice I wish I had Heard... Or listened To :-)

(Okay, this is a LONG one. I have the flu and a lot of time now...)

At 46, I am pretty happy with where I am. Happy enough that if I had to live my life over, I don't think I would change anything to be in a different place. Could it be better? Sure. It always can, right? But it could be a lot worse - a lot worse - as well. There are things I have now that I would never change or sacrifice.

Does that mean there has been no pain? Hardly. No trials or tribulations? Absolutely not. But I do think that you learn from mistakes (even when you don't realize it), and if you don't get overwhelmed and stuck dwelling on the mistakes and failures then they ultimately make you a better person. I suppose I should say that they can as we all know people who either couldn't pick themselves up or could not move on after a failure, right? Please don't take this as my being a pollyanna or having rose colored glasses. There are things in my life that didn't necessarily make me a better person but I still wouldn't change because they either provided me with something in my life I wouldn't give up, or put me in a place I am glad I am at. Case in point: seven years ago I was single again after a long (four years) and nasty divorce. Friends thought I would never marry again because of it. It hurt my family, hurt my finances, and definitely hurt my attitude for a while. To this day I am more suspicious, less sure of anything that is supposed to be 'definite', less trusting than I once was. Seems like something I would never do again or something I would change if I could, right? Absolutely not.

It provided me with the best daughter there is, bar none. It put me in a place where I was ready to begin another relationship as I turned forty years old, enabling me to meet, fall in love, and marry my current wife. It allowed me to have another child, a son who would not have been born had I not divorced. So if I had it all to do over, I would do it all the same to get to where I am now. But I was far more slective the second time around!

That being said, there are things I have learned that hopefully enable me to make better choices now, things that would have helped me avoid some mistakes I have made. These are the same things that I find myself telling my 14 year old (that I wish she would pay more attention to). They are the things I will be telling my 3 year old son in the years to come. I am sure some are the same things my parents told me, too. Things that I thought I understood but either didn't really listen to or didn't really grasp as well as I thought I did. Knowing that, I thought I would write those all down and combine them with things I learned along the way.

Well, here they are in no particular order:

* Try and keep a reasonable perspective on things. Do you have to work too much or study too hard some times? Sure. Do you have to sacrifice things that others around you aren't/don't? Sure. Will there be times that some things - major things - change your life (and not always for the better)? Yes. But time moves forward, life goes on, and you will rebound if you want to. Want to. None of it will matter how happy you are in five years.

* Things won't make you happy. People won't make you happy. Events won't make you happy. Only you can make yourself happy. Look, I always want 'more' and am rarely satisfied. But I am happy where I am. Would I like a bigger house? Sure. I would be happy in a smaller house though, too.

* While you don't need to only spend money on budgeted items, have a budget. You hear all the stories about how a storm, or fire, or business closing ruined someone financially. Realistically? I find that you are in more trouble from getting into credit debt than anything else. You live over your head and then can't catch up. For example, if you make $40,000 a year and spend it all plus charge another $5000, you lived on $45,000, right? Even if you don't get used to living that way (and most do) you conceivably have to live the next year on $35,000 (a $10,000 difference in lifestyle) to catch up. That's like taking a paycut of 20%. If you can't live on what you make, how are you going to take a 20% paycut ext year? Learn to live on your pay. Credit cards are so you don't have to carry cash, or so you can pay for emergency unexpected events like a car repair. They are not to finance vacations you haven't been able to save for, or to buy expensive clothing with. On-line shopping, ATMs, impulse purchases, keeping up with the Joneses, dining out a lot... all can drain your money faster than you realize. Have an overall budget, check it occasionally, and pull back if you find that you are going over. Have a Savings Account you will not touch. Not even for emergencies if you can save or use other money you have. Also have a Savings Account you will use to save up for big items you want to buy. You'll see how you can get there by saving. And sometimes, after you save instead of using a credit card, the little time will make you realize that you actually don't really want it. If you still do, you have the money to buy it. Think about each purchase. Stay away from purchases when you feel down and need a 'pick me up'.

* Stay in shape and stay active. Do not take it for granted. When I was in my late teens and early twenties, I was extremely active and in shape. Better than most, probably. I took martial arts, ran, biked to work, worked out at a gym once or twice a day, etc. Then I got married... I put myself into my career... I had a child... I went through a draining divorce... I still hit 40 in better shape than a lot of my peers, but I hadn't seriously worked out in many years. A month here, a three month membership there... I started working out a bit more after the divorce, found out I was still pretty flexible, still pretty strong, etc. I knew I had a few pounds to lose but I thought that was about it. I did not realize that age does catch up to you. Yes, even you. Again in a new relationship, getting married, having another child... any thoughts of working out were pushed to 'later'. At 45, my doctor was still 'impressed' enough with my blood tests, etc. that he told me "If you are in this shape at 45 there is no reason you can't be in this shape at sixty'. Almost immediately after that I started getting some foot pain (plantar faciitis - basically separated the tendons in my heel). Not dealing with it and suffering through the pain rather than address it, it worsened with scar tissue and it became impossible to walk pain free. I found out it was usually due to tightness in the legs (something I never had as I always had been flexible from all the stretching I did in my twenties}. I was actually surprised to find that I couldn't even touch my toes! By about six inches! The limp threw something off in my back and now I have been dealing with back pain, too. Something I had never had before. Being much less active now, because of the leg and back, I have put a few pounds on instead of taking them off as I had hoped I would be doing. Lesson learned: get in shape and stay in shape. Its easier than trying to get back into shape!

* Without getting too strict on 'health foods, let me say simply: white sugar and white flour are bad for you. High fructose corn syrup is terrible for you. Shortening is terrible for you. Think about it. If businesses chemically change something so it won't break down in nature, does it sound like a good thing to put it in your body? I am not a vegetarian or only eat all natural foods. I eat an occasional fast food hamburger when on the road in a rush, and have a sweet tooth. But I eat fast foods as little as possible and eat dessert less than I would like. I don't drink soda anymore. It is probably why I only have a few pounds to lose at 46 when some of my peers have many more, or high blood pressure, etc. There is a reason why diabetes and obesity is rising in America along with the use of high fructose corn syrup.

* That brings up another vice: smoking. I never was a cigarette smoker as I saw my dad battle with it, ultimately leading to the heart attack that claimed his life at only fifty years old. No cancer, 'just' a heart attack. I understand the appeal to some extent. I do like an occasional cigar and like the taste. I like having the 'prop' when you are socializing. I like the ritual of a cigar, and how smoking is an activity that forces you to slow down and chill a bit. But only a few things can happen when you start cigarettes: 1- you don't like it and quit, 2- you like it and have to quit anyway, 3 - or you like it and can't / don't quit. As it is a guarantee that it is bad for your lungs and heart, which of those options is a good one? Don't start and you won't have to deal with them. You will be glad you avoided it by your late twenties, guaranteed.

* Learn the basics of compounding interest and start putting money aside for retirement when you are just starting out. Sure it seems so far off, but you will get there eventually and be glad you did plan for it. What if someone told you that when you retire they would give you $75 dollars for every dollar you put aside when you were twenty years old? You would find some cash, right? If you found out that instead of that $20,000 car you bought that would be worth almost nothing in five years, you put the same $20,000 away in a bank you would have $1,500,000? It is highly unlikely you will ever save a million and a half dollars while in your forties and fifties. Bt if you start early enough... and that is the point. That little bit of interest you get each year is like a little snow on a snowball rolling down a mountain. Or look at it as the the principle of 'she told two friends, and they told two friends, and they told two friends..." . The earlier you start, the more you have - BY FAR. At the end, each extra year is ENORMOUS. After a while the money you put in is considerably dwarfed by the interest... and that continues to expand exponentially. After thirty five or forty years (aprox.), the money grows at an enormous pace. But it needs those years. If you are planning to retire at 65, you have to start putting money away in your early twenties. Sure, it never hurts to put money away (well, it always hurts a bit) and if you can't start when you are 22 don't say 'forget it' then. But $20,000 put away every year when you are in your forties and fifties won't amount to as much as if you put $5000 or $10,000 a year away starting at 22. I didn't do this and am now scrambling to save for when I retire, not wanting to take a substantial cost of living hit. I know friends who will retire - comfortably - on small investments they sacrificed for in their twenties.

* Do without a car as long as you can. Silly, huh? Doesn't everyone want a car at sixteen, the urge to hit the open road? Sure. I did. I was also the one who ended up driving friends all over that didn't have cars. I felt bad for them then. Looking back, I was working two jobs each vacation and summer to afford it while they travelled and hung out at the beach. I worked during the school year while they had time to study or relax. The smart ones who had cars when they were in school didn't spend much money on them and spent more on school and less time working than studying. I see it now, even if I couldn't then. It just isn't worth it. Definitely go your first year of college without one. You'll see more and experience more of campus life without one, too.

* Speaking of cars, when its time to get a car, don't buy used cars them for color, style, or radios. It goes without saying - or should - but get one that won't cost a lot of money to upkeep because you get sucked in by a nice paint job! I spent a lot of money in my late teens and in college trying to make an older used car be something special... money it was not easy for me to get when I was seventeen or twenty and a student. That does not mean you have to buy the 'ugly brown station wagon with low miles', or should buy new. It means you should look for something you like, but only buy if it will run relatively repair free. If not, move on and set your sights a bit lower on the model.

* Everyone needs time alone at times. Enjoy it. Recharge your batteries and don't feel guilty about it.

* Make your friends your family and your family your friends. Kiss them. If you can't kiss them, hug them. And no matter what, say 'I love you.' to them. Even if you have to laugh it off as corny, say it. There will be a time when you can't any longer and you don't get to pick when that is.

* It isn't the person who dies with the most toys that wins, as we have all seen on bumper stickers and the shirts. It's the guy who dies with the most true friends. Gather them around you, celebrate and enjoy them. You may think that not getting together with friends in order to work late would be a good thing because you'll be able to buy that television you always wanted. But while I see many people cry when a friend dies, I have yet to see someone tear up when a tv breaks. Realize what is important.

* That being said, don't use that as an excuse not to work hard. Hard work is good for you, gives you a sense of accomplishment, and leads to good things in life. Relish and enjoy it.

* And that leads to: Do What You Like, Like What You Do. Study hard when young and work hard at school so that you will be able to do something you like for a profession. You will spend too many hours doing it to hate it. The extra hour a day studying will be well worth it. You don't want to have to spend eight hours a day doing something you don't like (for the rest of your life!) because you can't get the job you really want, right? Or regret - for the next fifty years of working for people not as bright as you - that you didn't get better grades because you socialized too much. Study hard now and be in a position to do what you enjoy for the rest of your life.

* Never pick on people. Don't try to build yourself up by tearing others down. It does not make you stand taller. Standing idly by while others pick on them is no different. More people have things done to them unjustly because everyone stays quiet, not because there are so many people who are terrible. Don't be one of the sheep. Don't be too afraid that someone won't like you if you stand up for someone else. Even when others don't join in in standing up for someone (even if they tease you about it), they all will respect you. You don't have to hang out with everyone, or even like everyone. But never pick on them. You will respect yourself - then and in the future - when you look back on the times you stood up for someone. You will never look back at yourself favorably for the times you made people feel bad.

* Live life, don't watch it. Read. Travel. Experience. Take a course. Learn something. Be active. Don't sit and watch someone on television have a life, or sit and play video games pretending that you are doing something.

* Treasure your time with those you love. I lost my dad when he was seemingly healthy. Suddenly and while on vacation. You don't get a warning. Sometimes things just change - suddenly - and you lose someone. A heart attack, an accident, whatever. Do not take the time with them for granted.

* When you have kids, enjoy them. Sure, discipline them, yell at them when you have too, etc. but continue to enjoy them. I have loved every moment of my time with my fourteen year old and am in a small panic that she will be off to college and then off to life in just four years. It seems like only yesterday that she was ten, and in that same span our conversations (minimal as they can be now at fourteen) will no longer be a daily part of my life. She is doing what she should be doing, pulling away, so she can live one day on her own. I realize that in my head. But my heart will miss her not being in my house every day from when she leaves to when I die. Enjoy it all now, as much as possible. As crazy as it is in this house with a three year old boy, as overwhelming as it can get, I am trying to enjoy it all.

* Your first obligation when you decide to have kids is them. You are no longer first in your own life. Until you are ready to sacrifice and put them first, don't have them. Once you do? Be their parent first and pal second. Too many people try to be their kid's buddy and then find it difficult to be a parent. Love them and they will love you, even when they don't like you.

* You know how you take pictures and think you'll put them in an album 'later'? Or don't write something down because you know you'll remember? How could you forget, right? Trust me on this. Write the stories down and put the pictures in the album (on-line is fine for both) as you will forget. And you will forget more as you get older. And you will forget things you don't even realize you forgot, and don't miss - until someone reminds you of something and you wish you remembered it better. I'd tell you of all the important things my dad told me or things I learned from my kids and give specifics, but I forgot them.

* No one wants to hear your complaints. Sorry to tell you, but while your spouse and parents are totally sympathetic to your issues, even they don't really look forward to hearing your complaints. And no one else remotely does. Ask for help when you need it, by all means. Get something of your chest - quickly - if you have to. But don't be a Drama Queen or King and don't think your problems are more important than anyone else's. We all have them, right? How miserable would we be if we all whined about them to everyone that would listen.

* Don't complain, fix the problem or move on if you can't.

* Keep learning. Even if you don't like school and can't wait to get out, find a way to learn something. Cooking. How to play basketball better. New computer programs. And teach others. Learning keeps your mind growing and fresh and teaching others really makes your mind work on it by thinking about it, talking about it, seeing what they are doing, and listening to them all at once. It really exercises your brain.

* No good ever comes from having 'one last drink'. And rarely are any memories made while 'doing shots' the memories you look back fondly on.

* Drugs. Same as cigarettes. You will either not like them or like them, right? If you don't like them, you'll wish you hadn't used them. If you like them you will spend money on them that could have gone to something else, risk embarrassment for yourself (and your family) in taking them, be breaking the law while you buy and use them (risking a permanent record and total change of career and life), and possibly be hooked. Are any of those worth it? Either way you will regret using them. So don't start. That way you don't have to quit.

* Don't give in to peer pressure. Apply it.

* While on that subject, and I have no scientific evidence to prove this, different liquors will affect you differently. I realize there is the same amount of alcohol in one beer than there is in a glass of wine than there is in a shot. And sure, you are more likely to drink more if you are doing shots than drinking wine. But that doesn't explain why a shot of vodka makes you feel one way, a shot of tequila or Jack Daniels another. Know what you can drink, know what your limits are, and keep an eye on your friends who have shown they don't know theirs. That goes for when you are twenty one or forty five.

* You know all those stories you tell at parties or in bars about 'that guy' that did this or that? You don't want to be 'that guy' in everyone else's stories. Think about that while you are out with your friends. Everyone has friends who still bring up stories about something stupid they did twenty years ago. Minimize those stories as you grow up.

* Everyone makes mistakes. You will make the most when you are in your teens and early twenties as you have knowledge but little life experience. Just don't make mistakes that carry forward. If you dent your car, you will pay a penalty. If you hurt someone else, you will be changed forever. If you get drunk and sick, you will be embarrassed and feel terrible. If you get arrested for drugs, you will lose jobs for the rest of your life. Think before you do something. Not just on if it can go bad. Not just on what would happen. Think also on how it will affect you for the rest of your life if it goes bad.

* All those things you want to do but won't be finished for five years? Start them as soon as you can. Sure, you'll start taking guitar lessons or karate classes thinking "This will take me five years before I'm any good!". Absolutely you'll start learning a language thinking "It'll be years before this is usable!" But in five years you can either have those skills or still not have them. Your choice.

Lastly, take all advice with a grain of salt and a dose of suspicion. ;-)

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Time To Go Back?

Bill Simmons (ESPN, Page 2) is a good writer who I read on occasion, and I stumbled across this article (actually a good friend sent it my way - Thanks again, Kevin).  

Please read Bill Simmons article, You Can Help Ease New Orleans' Pain, here.  

Ostensibly about the NBA, their All-Star Game this past weekend in NOLA, and the comeback of the NBA, it made some good points about New Orleans we should consider. I know I am. After reading it, I am still not ready to take the family and go there for a week - as I did for 7 straight years during JazzFest.   The crime rate alone is prohibitive and the government has got to get a handle on that if they want the city to come back.  Especially because, as Mr. Simmons mentions in the article,  you go on vacation to relax and not to be reminded, constantly, of how terrible things are and have been there.  "New Orleans has baggage now -- visible baggage -- and when people are on vacation, they want to deal only with baggage like suitcases."  Perfectly said, I think.  But maybe that is just the first time back... Maybe its time we should do a long weekend and see how it goes?  I wouldn't be trying to organize a friends and family trip for 10 people to stay 5-7 days right away, but I'm thinking a Fri. afternoon - Mon. eve trip may be in order... Extend it a few extra days next year, the way we did in the beginning of our annual JazzFest trips?  Fly out on Friday morning, leave early Monday eve?  If not this year, maybe next?

Something to think about... 



Sunday, February 17, 2008

Tattoos...

I was reading a blog attached to a site about a new film, "Happiness Is...". While I haven't delved into it deeply enough to understand the relevance, I came across a posting about a tattoo experience which I ended up commenting on.

Anyway, I thought I would post my response here on my blog as well in case anyone has any comments or thoughts.
_______________

My tattoo experience was very different than that described above [in the posting] ... I am currently 46 and have two tattoos, neither of which I had on my 32nd birthday. Despite my family being one that frowned on tattoos, I always liked them. I had friends that got some after high school, some that got them in the military, a few that got a few in their college rebellion. I saw many I liked, but never any that I liked enough to want on my body for the rest of my life. I understood they were as deeply personal as something could get and therefor an item that one truly couldn't judge. One man's junk is another man's treasure, as they say. But I'd look at 18 year old guys with the Tazmanian Devil on their arm, or gals getting Tweetie Bird, and wonder if they would be happy about the decision when they were in their 50s, let alone 80s. I'd also see tattoos done by people that had no art ability at all and wonder how the recipient felt. Diamonds aren't forever... Tattoos are. Having studied martial arts for years, the appeal of the dragon and/or tiger were obvious, but didn't have enough personal meaning when I was young. So I didn't get one in my youth and as I started into my thirties it had been years since I seriously thought about getting one; the last time was when my father passed (I was barely 26) and seriously considered a memorial piece but still could not think of one I'd want forever. Then, at 32, I became a dad. I saw another new dad come in one day with a 'single needle' tattoo that was practically a photograph of his new born daughter. While not the style I liked for myself, I knew the tattoo artist had talent. We talked and that following Saturday I hopped on my motorcycle (another lifestyle choice my family wasn't happy with) and drove up to the tattoo parlor. No appt., no calls ahead, nothing. Very naive. Getting there so early we had time to discuss what I liked ('Japanese style'), what I wanted (a piece representing my new daughter and my deceased dad), size (a piece on my upper arm that could be covered by a short sleeve shirt and only visible if I was shirtless and therefor knew whoever I was with well, ie no business situations), and talked about specifics (ultimately deciding on a tiger protecting a Phoenix - the legendary bird that rises from the ashes, symbolizing rebirth). To get all that in I ended up getting a larger one than originally expected (from two inches above my elbow to the top of my shoulder. He drew it right on my arm, we made a few changes, he drew the details in a little more, and then started lining it all in. As it was such a large piece he said he typically would get all the lines in and then I would come back to get it colored. Since it was still pretty early and they were slow (the other artist in the shop was handling the other walk-ins), we did it all in one sitting. As he finished up with the black, doing some shading, I added my daughter's name and it is my favorite part, to this day.
 (This one took approximately 7.5 hours)

I did not find it particularly painful except when they were directly over a bone. I imagine an ankle or hip tattoo would not be the most pleasant experience, but I thought it was more uncomfortable than painful... Like someone scraping away at you. Nothing you enjoy, but not real pain, either. And either way, contrary to the posting, I didn't and wouldn't have felt the pain was a part of the experience or one of the points in getting it. You do it despite it, not because of it. At least I (and everyone I know) did. The only negative experience came the following day. Home and doing some work on the house, I had a sleeveless shirt on so it could heal and get some air. My mother came by to visit, walked in, started crying and said "There are two types of people in this world: people who get tattoos and people who don't. You just crossed the line." And she promptly left. She has come to accept it (she'll never like it) though. 
As far as the second tattoo, I didn't think I would ever get a second. I loved the first one, got a lot of compliments (from anyone except my mother, lol), but had no desire for any more. 11 years later however, at 43, my wife and I decided to have another baby. Sure enough, after my son was born I wanted to get another tattoo to have him with me - to be part of me - forever. I sketched out what I wanted (a dragon armband, Japanese style) and found an artist through some internet searching. I made an appt. and showed up, ready for my tattoo.... She informed me she was booked for over 4 months, this was a consultation appt. only, and took some measurements to do preliminary sketches! Boy, had things changed in the tattoo world! The rest is pretty similar to the first experience. No real pain, some discomfort, and another result I love and others seem to like as well. I had my baby son's name added at the end (within the dragon's tail, and my wife's name (within a red ball the dragon is clutching). I now have all three of them with me where ever I am or go.
(This one took approximately 5.5 hours)
Neither is visible unless I am shirtless, but they are there for me, no one else. Barring a third child there will be no more though...

I think... ;-)


Friday, February 15, 2008

And on Page 3, below the fold...


E - It just doesn't stop, does it?  Unbelievable.

Accused Priest Tests Positive For HIV
 
Thursday, Feb 14, 2008 - 04:59 PM Updated: 09:50 PM
 
By Associated Press

FORT WORTH, Texas - A former priest accused of sexually abusing at least five minors in Rhode Island and Texas is HIV positive, Catholic diocese officials said Thursday. 

Last week, a leader in the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth heard someone mention that the Rev. Philip A. Magaldi has the virus that causes AIDS, said diocese spokesman Pat Svacina. The leader, the Rev. Michael F. Olson, then got verbal confirmation from Magaldi as well as a letter from his doctor who said he has HIV but not AIDS, Svacina said. 

The diocese then alerted the alleged victims and the parishes where Magaldi served for nearly four decades, Svacina said. 

Fort Worth diocese officials said they believe that Magaldi has been HIV positive since at least 2003. 

Magaldi, 71, lives in a retirement center and diocese officials declined to disclose where. He has previously said he was innocent of the sexual abuse allegations, for which he has not been charged. 

 E- Yeah. Sure. Celibate like he was supposed to be.  Must have gotten HIV through all the needle sharing the priests do.

He was removed as a priest in 1999 amid claims of sexual misconduct in Providence, R.I., where he served from 1960-90, and the Fort Worth area, where he served from 1990-92 and 1993-99. 

He was out of the ministry while serving a brief stint in prison in 1992 after embezzling about $200,000 from his Rhode Island parish, officials said. 

E - Did you get that one?  He was removed as a priest in 1999 after sexual misconduct allegations, but continued to be a priest during and after serving time for embezzling $200k from his parish.  What did a priest need the $200k for?  Homosexual hookers and cocaine?

In an unrelated case, Magaldi also was accused of lying in the Newport case of Claus von Bulow, who was acquitted of trying to kill his heiress wife. 

E - Yeah, a real stand-up guy this Magaldi.  Definitely someone who should be ministering to the flock.  Sexual relations, homosexual relations, possible pedophilia, grand theft, possible perjury....  Ad he's hearing confessions.  Nice.

In 2006, a pastor at a North Richland Hills Church apologized to the congregation amid reports that five years earlier he didn't tell police ...

E - Another stand-up guy...

...after learning of inappropriate material involving minors on the computer used by Magaldi, who led the church the last six years of his ministry. 

E - Add child porn to the list.

David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, urged the dioceses to aggressively seek out potential victims. He said it's impossible to know the number of victims because many children and teens abused by priests don't ever come forward. 

"There's a real chance of someone suffering not only a horrific childhood trauma but also a current adult infection because of this priest," Clohessy said. 

Magaldi is one of six priests in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth accused of abusing minors,

E - One of 6. In just the Fort Worth area.  What do you think it is nationally?  One thousand?  Ten thousand?   

... according to 700 pages of previously secret files that were part of a sexual abuse lawsuit settled in 2005. The documents were released by a judge last year. 

In Rhode Island, three separate allegations were reported in 1998, 2002 and last year against Magaldi.

Bishop Kevin Vann of the Fort Worth diocese is flying to Rome next week to ask the Vatican to expedite the process of having Magaldi defrocked, which would remove him from clerical status, Svacina said.

E - Yeah, better get him of that list 'quickly'.  Its only been 9 years since he was tossed.  If they don't act soon, someone may think the Vatican doesn't really take it seriously or care.

According to the Providence diocese, it is in the process of contacting those who have made allegations against Magaldi.

In a statement, the Providence diocese said it fully supports the efforts of the Diocese of Fort Worth to seek dismissal of Magaldi from the priesthood.

E - They didn't do it (despite the sexual abuse, child porn, and theft... but they 'support' another diocese doing it.  Big of them, huh?

Magaldi's earlier troubles included a 1985 indictment on perjury and obstruction charges for allegedly lying in a sworn statement in support of von Bulow to help him get a new trial. The charges against Magaldi were dropped in 1987.

In Von Bulow's second trial in 1985, he was acquitted of trying to kill his wife with insulin injections at their Newport, R.I., mansion.


Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Boston Wine Expo

Went to the Boston Wine Expo this weekend with my wife...  Some random thoughts:

- Check out Wine TV.  Over the top, in your face persona, but a guy who is doing the right thing (making wine more accessible while not turning it into soda).  He wants you to appreciate it and learn about it, but not be intimidated by it.  Check out: http://tv.winelibrary.com/ 

- I enjoy attending this with my wife more than anyone else.

- Every year I don't go for both days I regret it and wish I had. 

- I don't know why everyone who loves wine doesn't attend this event.  I would cancel a trip to make this.

- I have to find out where other Wine Expos are held and see if I can travel there at the right time(s).

- I wish I owned a winery or vineyard ;-)


Monday, February 11, 2008

Still Stunned....

... and busy.  
;-)

Monday, February 4, 2008

Stunned...

As is most of New England and the Boston area in particular, I am stunned at the results of the Super Bowl last evening.

Did I know it 'could' happen?  Sure.  Did I 'know' the Patriots were lucky to win some of their regular season games and proved themselves to be both human and beatable?  Absolutely.  Did I buy in to the whole Team Of Destiny and Greatest Sports Team Ever brouhaha?  Positively. 

Despite the fact I had a gnawing worry over the last few games that they had shown themselves to be beatable and weaknesses had been exploited... Depute that it was only a matter of time before some coach put all those weaknesses into one game plan... Despite that The Giants Coach Coughlin already almost did it just a few weeks ago and now had an opportunity to fine tune it...  Despite the fact it didn't look good from the start of the game... Despite the fact the Giants looked better than they should be and the Pats looked worse than they are...  Despite all that, and not because of their past close wins but because of them, the Pats appeared to be on a course to their 4th Super Bowl win in 7 years.  The closer other teams came to winning, the more unbeatable the Patriots appeared to truly be.

And I say all this as a Green Bay Packer fan.  I am a hometown fan of the Patriots, born and raised here, but not one of the uberfans of the team that Boston tends to put out.  A lifelong fan of Coach Vince Lombardi, I came to respect Belichick as a gifted coach second only to Lombardi.  I became a fan of this team for some of the same reasons I love Green Bay:  they are a team, not a collection of arrogant prima donnas and superstars.  The first of Belichick's wins at the Super Bowl had the team take the field that night announced simply as "The New England Patriots!', not coming on - one by one - to hear their names announced.  That, more than any one play or game or win, made me a fan.  Prior to that I had rooted for Green Bay when the two teams met at the Super Bowl and went to the first Monday Night Game the next season to see them fight again.  I still rooted for Green Bay against The Tuna and Bledsoe and Co. and was happy when the Green Machine were once again victorious.  Yet I found myself passionately getting caught up in the Patriots this year, wanting to see them don the mantle of Greatest Team Ever.  While some others began to root against them because of the coach's arrogance or quarterback's dating models, I saw a team made up of superstars who still played as a team and passed credit around liberally.  A coach who, although tight lipped and defensive, was not a bragging and arrogant peacock as we have all seen others do with less coaching talent.  I thought this team's just rewards were to be remembered as The Best.

Did the Giants Offense win that game?  Not so much as the Patriot's Offense lost it. One can't entirely blame the Pats Offensive Line, although they were pretty beaten up and gave Brady no time to stay in the pocket, protected, and find his target.  They also didn't break any holes open for the running game - and with no running game the Giants could focus on stopping the Pats receivers.  With no time to throw, there was also no time for the Pats receivers to break free...

Did the Patriots' Defense blow it?  They held a Super Bowl worthy team to 17 points... Kind of tough to say they didn't do their job... yet I can't help thinking about that last Giants drive.  All they needed to do was stop a) the big play, and b)  a march down the field ending in a touch down.  They had stopped the Giants from doing that for 3 quarters already.  yet they didn't do it when it was most needed.

Did the coach lose it?  He didn't go for 3 when he could have earlier in the game, and didn't use his last 34 seconds for a few plays to get a field goal at the end, either.  All or nothing, the way he has played his 8 years here.  Why didn't he address the lack of a running game and well covered receivers until so late in the game? Finally, in the 4th, they decided to change from their season long 3-pronged attack and simply go with something that works: quick 10 yard quick throws up the middle.  They finally did, and they scored.  Why didn't we see that in the 1st half after they realized their deep receptions were not going to happen and they really had no real running game coming together?  And where was the 'no huddle offense' which would have tired out that Defensive Line of the Giants earlier?  Can we blame him for the loss?  No, but he doesn't get off scott free, either.  We now know that he is human and not a football god.

Maybe it was Brady?  Did he play injured?  Stoically play with limited motion or in pain, unable to be his normal Tom Terrific?  Would we have won if he admitted an injury?  No.

And it wasn't Boston's Mayor Mumbles Mannino jinxing the team with a planned-too-early Super Bowl celebration.  Or Tom's current model galpal Giselle jinxing the team as Dallas' Tony Romo was 'jinxed' by another famous galpal.  

The Patriot's were still the best team of this season.  They were undefeated for 18 and 5/6 games. For 99% of the season (a season longer than the 72 Dolphins' season - a season in an era of free agents and salary caps - a season designed by the former Commissioner of Football for 'parity' among teams).  They even faced and beat the Giants prior, so we know the Giants aren't 'better'.  But the Giants were certainly better when it counted, this Sunday the 3rd of February 2008.

The Patriots have no one person or area or jinx to blame - they just didn't play well enough to win against a team that was pumped and confident, playing its best football of the year, and one that knew the Patriots were not unbeatable.  They hammered away and fought for every down.  They never gave up, never wore down, and never doubted themselves.  In the end, the Giants were the better team on Super Bowl Sunday.







 






Friday, February 1, 2008

Social Security facts -- Very interesting
'Your' Social Security :
Just in case some of you didn't know this, it's easy to check out if you don't believe it. It doesn't matter whether you are Democrat of Republican... Facts are Facts!!! 

Our Social Security   

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social  
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:  

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, 
E - He broke his promise.

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program, 
E - yes, well we know how that turned out.

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year, 
 E- Hmmm... Kind of like another voluntary retirement savings program I can think of...

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, 
E - Yes, but we know how that goes.  Once they get your money...

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
E - Ah, well...

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of  the money we paid to the Federal government to "put away" -- you may be interested in the following:  

-------------------------------------------------------------  

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust Fund " and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?  
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate. 
E - Is anyone really surprised?

--------------------------------------------------------------------  

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?  
A: The Democratic Party. 
E - Yet they bill themselves the party of the Elderly and Retirees.  A good con job.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------  

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?  

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the  US 
E - Nice to know Wanna-Be-Prez Ali G. had the interests of the elderly at heart, huh?

-------------------------------------------------------------------  

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants who haven't paid in, pushing an already overloaded and taxed system over the brink, jeopardizing your payments and any cost of living raises?  

A: That's right!    Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.  Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The  Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!  You paid in your whole life but they collect just as you do.
E - I'm all for compassion and helping the elderly out that never paid in, but shouldn't that be some other type of program?  One that doesn't penalize the American seniors that paid in their whole lives?